For too long biking has been viewed skeptically as a white-people thing, a big city thing, an ultra-fit athlete thing, a twenty-something thing, a warm weather thing or an upper-middle-class thing. And above all else, it’s seen as a guy thing.
But guess what? The times, they are a-changin’. More than 100 million Americans rode a bike in 2014, and bicycles have out-sold cars most years in the U.S. since 2003.
In their efforts to discredit renewable energy and support continued fossil fuel burning, many anti-environmentalists have circulated a dual image purporting to compare a lithium mine with an oil sands operation. It illustrates the level of dishonesty to which some will stoop to keep us on our current polluting, climate-disrupting path (although in some cases it could be ignorance).
It’s safe to say that lobsters aren’t a budding new demographic for soda companies.
So why did a lobster recently caught in the waters off Grand Manan, New Brunswick, have part of a Pepsi logo tattooed on its claw?
That’s a question that baffled Karissa Lindstrand, the fisherman who spotted the uncanny image during a lobster haul, according to the Guardian. Lindstrand happens to drink up to a dozen Pepsi sodas a day, but she was struck by the image’s unusual dimensions.
There’s nothing quite like a cup of coffee in the morning. Whether it’s from your local shop, brewed at home or snagged from a tiny cart somewhere, people all over the world start and their days with the centuries-old psychoactive beverage.
And aside from being a the only thing that can drag some of us out of bed on tough mornings, there are actually some more significant reasons—including health, economic and more—why it’s a good way to start your day.
Meeting this challenge involves not only providing sufficient calories for every person, but also assuring a balanced diet that includes the protein and nutrients that are essential to good health. In a newly published study, we explain how marine microalgae could be a sustainable solution for solving global macro-hunger.
“I wanted to study the wonders of the Great Barrier Reef, the intricate and complex connections between the thousands of different life-forms that represent the most diverse ecosystem on the planet,” Miller told Truthout.
But in the last two years, this has all changed for him.
“I now look at the reef as an ecosystem that is suffering from our actions and I feel guilty beyond belief that this is happening in my backyard, on our generation’s watch,” he explained. “I no longer dream of the kaleidoscope of life, color and movement that represents the world’s coral reefs. Instead, I worry and fight for the actual existence of coral reefs as we know them, as the changes I see are happening all too quickly—much quicker than the reef can adapt.”
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) said final week it will concede farmers to plant dual new strains of genetically mutated (GMO) corn, one combined by Monsanto and a other by Syngenta, but supervision oversight. The new strains are tolerant of a weed killers dicamba and glufosinate.
Don’t skip out. Stay Informed. Get EcoWatch’s Top News of a Day.
Inflammation is a healthy routine that helps your physique reanimate and urge itself from harm. Unfortunately, it can infrequently run furious and turn chronic.
Chronic inflammation can final for a prolonged time—weeks, months or years—and might lead to several health problems. On a splendid side, there are many things we can do to revoke inflammation and urge your altogether health.
This essay outlines a minute devise for an anti-inflammatory diet and lifestyle.
What is Inflammation?
Inflammation is your body’s approach to strengthen itself from infection, illness or injury.
As partial of a inflammatory response, your physique increases prolongation of white blood cells, defence cells and substances called cytokines that assistance quarrel infection.
Classic signs of strident (short-term) inflammation embody redness, pain, feverishness and swelling.
On a other hand, ongoing (long-term) inflammation is mostly wordless and occurs inside a physique though any conspicuous symptoms.
This form of inflammation can expostulate conditions like diabetes, heart disease, greasy liver illness and cancer (1, 2, 3, 4).
Chronic inflammation can also start when people are portly or underneath highlight (5, 6).
Bottom Line: Inflammation is a protecting resource that allows your physique to urge itself opposite infection, illness or injury. It can also start on a ongoing basis, that can lead to several diseases.
An Unhealthy Lifestyle Can Drive Inflammation
Certain lifestyle factors can foster inflammation, generally when they start on a unchanging basis.
Antioxidants work by shortening levels of giveaway radicals. These reactive molecules are combined as a healthy partial of your metabolism, though can lead to inflammation when they’re not hold in check.
Your anti-inflammatory diet should yield a healthy change of protein, carbs and fat during any meal. Make certain we also accommodate your body’s needs for vitamins, minerals, fiber and water.
One diet deliberate anti-inflammatory is a Mediterranean diet, that has been shown to revoke inflammatory markers such as CRP and IL-6 (29, 30, 31).
A low-carb diet also reduces inflammation, quite for people who are portly or have metabolic syndrome (32, 33, 34).
Vegetarian diets have also been shown to assistance revoke inflammation (35).
Bottom Line: Choose a offset diet that cuts out processed products and boosts your intake of whole, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant-rich foods.
Foods to Avoid
Some dishes are scandalous for compelling inflammation.
Consider minimizing or slicing these out completely:
But with a Jul 1 deadline for complying with Vermont’s GMO labeling law on a horizon, a handful of a largest multinational food companies have announced they will now tag GMOs—not only since they will be forced to, though since as General Mills claims, they trust “you should know what’s in your food and how we make ours.”
Have consumers won a GMO labeling battle? Have these food companies that so fiercely fought to keep labels off their products unequivocally separate with a Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), a multi-billion-dollar lobbying organisation that is still perplexing to overturn Vermont’s law in a courts, and preempt it in Congress?
To be sure, consumer vigour has had an impact on brands’ decisions to label. We should applaud that. But before we mangle out a champagne, it’s value observant that not all of a food companies that announced skeleton to tag have taken a clever position on labeling. Equally important, four out of a five companies announced skeleton to tag after a Senate bill to preempt Vermont’s labeling law failed, though before a Senate has a possibility to come back with an nice chronicle of a check after Congress earnings on Apr 4 from Easter recess.
Is there something some-more to these new announcements than only a need to approve with Vermont’s law? As in, a plan to peace consumers into complacency, while during a same time forcing Congress to give food companies what they’ve wanted all along—a giveaway pass on labeling?
It’s also value observant that all of a companies that have suggested skeleton to tag adamantly urge a “safety” of GMOs—without once mentioning a fact that a immeasurable infancy of GMO crops, from that GMO food mixture are derived, are sprayed with glyphosate, classified final year by a World Health Organization as “a illusive tellurian carcinogen.” Clearly, we have a prolonged approach to go before food companies acknowledge a harmful consequences of a GMO monoculture indication on a environment, tellurian health and tellurian warming.
Who’s labeling, and why?
Campbell’s Soup Co. CPB (NYSE), General Mills (NYSE:GIS), Mars and Kellogg’s (NYSE: K) and ConAgra Foods(NYSE CAG) have all announced they will tag GMOs in time to approve with Vermont’s Jul 1 deadline, and in suitability with a Vermont law’s standards. The companies contend that any costs compared with labeling won’t be upheld on to consumers—a explain that deflates one of a industry’s long-standing, despite customarily debunked, arguments that GMO labeling will lead to aloft food prices for consumers.
Campbell’s was initial out of a gate, and a initial to mangle with a GMA on a lobbying group’s non-negotiable position opposite imperative labeling. After spending a half a million dollars to assistance better California’s Proposition 37 list beginning that would have mandated labels, Campbell’s now says a association supports a imperative sovereign labeling solution. Following Campbell’s Jan. 1 announcement, we reached out to explain what a soup association would do if Vermont’s law were preempted during a sovereign level. A Campbell’s orator responded by observant that regardless of what happens in Congress, Campbell’s products will be labeled, with a difference “partially constructed with genetic engineering,” in all 50 states. On a surface, that’s good news. But let’s not forget that a sovereign labeling check could dissuade companies from copy those, or identical difference on a label, in a seductiveness of preventing food producers from “stigmatizing” biotechnology.
Similarly, we reached out to General Mills, Mars and Kellogg’s this week seeking for construction on their positions. Kellogg’s responded, though wouldn’t yield answers to a approach questions, referring us instead to a central statement (which doesn’t answer a questions). We haven’t nonetheless listened behind from ConAgra, though we did accept responses from General Mills and Mars.
When asked if General Mills now supports a imperative sovereign labeling solution, Mike Siemienas, manager of code media relations, told us in an email that a cereal hulk is “supportive of a indication identical to what is used for organic products.” In other words, voluntary, not mandatory. Asked if General Mills would tag a GMO products according to Vermont standards even if Congress were to preempt Vermont, Siemienas wrote: “… we would approve with any law that Congress passes.” We took that as a no.
But General Mills appears (so far) to be alone in stability to side with a GMA on hostile imperative labeling laws. Jonathan Mudd, Mars’ tellurian executive of media relations, told us by email that Mars, like Campbell’s, supports “the investiture of a imperative inhabitant labeling system.” Mudd also reliable that Mars will tag a products “consistent with Vermont” regardless of either or not Vermont is preempted “because we trust in consumer transparency.” Mars pitched in $376,000 to better California’s Proposition 37. But after anti-labeling food companies became boycott targets following a better of Prop 37, Mars sat out identical battles in Washington State (2013) and Oregon (2014).
Campbell’s and Mars both cited a “need to equivocate a 50-state patchwork” of labeling laws as their reason for ancillary a imperative sovereign solution, as against to ancillary states’ rights to pass GMO labeling laws. On a surface, a patchwork evidence competence sound rational—until we consider a fact that there are some-more than 100 state laws, governing food labeling, including a Vermont maple syrup labeling law, and a Minnesota law ruling a labeling of furious rice. None of these laws ever combined “chaos” in a marketplace, as U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has warned about Vermont’s GMO labeling law. And nothing were ever against with a same relentless determination, most reduction intemperate spending, as GMO labeling laws. Maybe since nothing of them influenced Monsanto’s bottom line?
Don’t skip out. Stay Informed. Get EcoWatch’s Top News of a Day.
In a pivotal win, a Oakland-based non-profit advocacy group, As You Sow defeated ExxonMobil’s try to conceal an innovative, initial of a kind shareholder resolution. The resolution asks Exxon to news a appetite resources in an energy-neutral metric—BTUs—in further to the traditional “barrels of oil equivalent” standard. Establishing a climate-friendly magnitude of appetite pot is a pivotal step in incentivizing management, and a market, to support a transition to a clean energy economy.
“We are gratified a SEC sided with shareholders endangered with meridian risk,” pronounced Danielle Fugere, As You Sow’s boss and arch counsel. “Exxon contingency concede shareholders to opinion on this initial step on a path toward purify energy. Broad support will give government a embodiment to rise a different and profitable low CO business plan, while progressing 100 percent BTU appetite replacements.”
In response to Exxon’s SEC bid to stop a fortitude from being voted on by shareholders, As You Sow successfully argued that, “… in a fast decarbonizing economy, hoary fuel companies contingency rise climate change-responsive business models” and one probable trail is to transition into appetite companies not contingent on CO intense, meridian deleterious commodities.
Exxon now accounts for a appetite resources in “barrels of oil equivalent.” As You Sow remarkable in a SEC reply that this accounting magnitude discourages a low CO transition by joining a calculation of a company’s assets, and therefore a value, to CO based-metrics.
The fortitude proposes reporting company appetite resources neutrally, by category, so that all resources—including solar, wind, biofuels, geothermal and other renewables—will be accounted for as BTUs and valued. This metric decouples Exxon and a shareholders from oil’s disappearing profitability, a sharpening meridian repairs and Exxon’s decreasing ability to economically reinstate a oil reserves.
Shareholders find Exxon’s care in commencement a unavoidable transition to apropos a diversified energy association means to contest in a decarbonizing economy.
As You Sow is concurrently filing a petition with a SEC to change a stating mandate to an energy neutral metric, that will giveaway a oil attention as a whole from oil-dependent financial valuation.