Jury to Decide if Monsanto PCBs Caused Plaintiffs’ Cancer

Don’t skip out. Stay Informed. Get EcoWatch’s Top News of a Day.

Monsanto’s argumentative story with PCBs is being played out in hearing in California state justice this week, as a agrochemical hulk has been indicted of causing dual late plaintiffs to rise cancer.

The polite lawsuit, Dauber, et al. v. Monsanto Co., et al, regards plaintiffs Roslyn Dauber, 62, and John Di Costanzo, 87, who both explain that their non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma was caused by eating PCB-contaminated food for years, Courtroom View Network (CVN) reported.

Scott Frieling, representing plaintiff Roslyn Dauber, delivers his opening statement.
Scott Frieling, representing plaintiff Roslyn Dauber, delivers his opening statement.

PCBs, or Polychlorinated Biphenyls, are synthetic chemicals once used to isolate wiring decades ago. Before switching operations to agriculture, Monsanto was a solitary manufacturer of a compound, raking a reported $22 million in business a year. But when PCBs were found to be rarely toxic, a association stopped prolongation of them in 1977 over human health and environmental concerns.

Still, a pervasive legacy of PCBs remains. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) banned them in 1979, saying:

PCBs have caused birth defects and cancer in laboratory animals, and they are a suspected means of cancer and inauspicious skin and liver effects in humans. EPA estimates that 150 million pounds of PCBs are diluted via a environment, including atmosphere and H2O supplies; an additional 290 million pounds are located in landfills in this country.

Countless individuals, school districts as good as major U.S. cities have given slammed Monsanto with lawsuits for cleanup costs, environmental wickedness and for claims that bearing to PCBs causes health problems to people and wildlife.

On Thursday, plaintiff attorney Scott Frieling of Dallas-based law firm Allen Stewart PC delivered an opening statement to jurors and Los Angeles County Superior Court Judge J. Stephen Czuleger about the history of PCBs, the problem in stealing them from a sourroundings and how these chemicals make their approach into a food chain.

“They are probably indestructible,” Frieling said. “Once PCBs are created, they will final a really prolonged time.”

Frieling also overwhelmed on how Monsanto allegedly knew that PCBs were poisonous for decades though continued prolongation of a essential devalue anyway.

According to CVN:

Frieling showed jurors inner Monsanto papers dating behind to a 1950’s that he claimed would infer a association knew for decades that PCBs acted a estimable open health risk though secretly represented them as being safe.

Freiling told jurors it was easy to couple a PCBs in Dauber and Di Costanzo’s bodies to Monsanto, since a association constructed 99 percent of a compounds sole in a United States. He claimed Monsanto intentionally avoided long-term reserve contrast on PCBs and instead publicized a formula of short-term tests that didn’t concede adequate time for disastrous health effects to turn evident.

In response, Monsanto profession Anthony Upshaw of Chicago-based law organisation McDermott Will Emery LLP argued that it could not be definitively proven that PCBs caused a plaintiffs’ cancer and that many people who have a same amounts of PCBs in their bodies never humour any inauspicious effects, CVN reported.

“The justification simply doesn’t support a avowal that a ancestral use of PCB products was a means of a plaintiffs’ harms,” Monsanto spokeswoman Charla Marie Lord told CVN. “We are assured that a jury will conclude, as past juries have done, that a former Monsanto Company is not obliged for a purported injuries.”

She also combined that Monsanto’s impasse in a hearing stems from contractual obligations compared with former chemical businesses that operated underneath a company’s name, and that Monsanto today is focused only on agriculture.

The stream hearing is approaching to run by a finish of March. Previous rulings over PCBs lawsuits, however, have ruled in preference of Monsanto. CVN remarkable that a Los Angeles jury and a Missouri state justice jury handed the company wins in 2014 and 2015, respectively.

Incidentally, a stream House check could give Monsanto permanent shield from guilt for injuries caused by PCBs. The New York Times reported last month that Republicans in Congress have extrinsic a proviso into the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) reauthorization check that would effectively exempt Monsanto from liability for injuries caused by PCBs.

Environmental profession Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., who has sparred over PCBs for 3 decades, wrote this week that a “so-called ‘Monsanto Rider’ would shield a chemical colossus from thousands of lawsuits by cities, towns, propagandize districts and individuals, who have been harmed by bearing to PCBs.”

“If Monsanto gets a way, a American people will compensate a high cost for corporate fervour and domestic corruption,” Kennedy said.

YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE 

Atlantic Salmon Is All But Extinct as a Genetically Eroded Version of Farmed Salmon Has Taken Over

Big Food Found Guilty in Multimillion Dollar Cover Up in GMO Labeling Fight

23 Million Salmon Dead Due to Toxic Algal Bloom in Chile

California Widow Sues Monsanto Alleging Roundup Caused Her Husband’s Cancer