Local Energy, Local Ownership

When internal appetite combines with internal ownership, a whole village benefits.

Power From The People Cover

From a People
(Chelsea Green Publishing, 2012) explores
how homeowners, co-ops, nonprofit institutions, governments and businesses are
putting appetite in a hands of internal communities by distributed energy
programs and energy-efficiency measures. Using examples from around a nation
— and spasmodic from around a universe — Greg Pahl explains how to plan,
organize, financial and launch community-scale appetite projects that harvest
energy from sun, wind, H2O and earth. The following mention is taken from
chapter 2, “Conservation and Relocalization.”


Photovoltaic Systems: All About Grid-Connected PV Systems

A grid-connected PV complement is a slightest costly and lowest-maintenance choice for a home solar el…

Energy News: Solar Energy Development, Uranium Prices, and Energy From Garbage

This installment of a unchanging appetite news underline includes stories about a congressional news on …

Economic Outlook: Decentralization and Personal Economic Responsibility

Causes for regard within a 1980s economy embody rising stagnation and dwindling a spendabl…

Economic Outlook: Economic Disaster

Rampant inflation, appetite shortages, and fight led a lot of commentators to envision an imminent econ…

Hearth Cooking: An Ancient Cooking Technique Revisited

Learn how to prepare on an open hearth, an ancient, unsentimental and beguiling culinary tradition….

Buy this book in a MOTHER EARTH NEWS store: Power From a People.

Keeping your appetite dollars
circulating in your village is one of a biggest advantages of smaller-scale,
local energy, and a pivotal to that is internal ownership. Local tenure of energy
resources transforms what would differently be only another corporate energy
project into an engine for internal mercantile development. Instead of promulgation money
out of state (or out of country), dollars spent on internal appetite projects have a
multiplier effect—direct and indirect—in a community. The approach outcome comes
from a construction of a plan itself, while a surreptitious outcome relates
to additional jobs and mercantile activity provision products and services to the
project (as good as a increase defended in a community, if it is locally
owned); this competence also embody internal bank loans that keep internal dollars
circulating in a community. There is also an prompted effect: a economic
activity generated by re-spending a salary warranted by those directly and
indirectly concerned in a project. All of this total can supplement adult to a
significant mercantile advantage for internal communities.

Investments in local
renewable appetite in sold assistance a internal economy. These projects tend to
be labor-intensive, so they generally engage some-more jobs per dollar invested (as
much as 3 times some-more according to a Wisconsin Energy Bureau) than
conventional appetite projects. They also tend to use some-more internal resources, so
more appetite dollars stay during home. It’s a win–win situation.

What forms of internal energy
projects competence work in your community? Most of a large, centralized,
fossil-fueled appetite systems for coal, oil, and healthy gas that we rest on
cannot be scaled down to internal village size. Most cities and towns don’t have
oil wells or refineries in their backyards—to contend zero of spark mines.
Virtually nothing of a sprawling hoary fuel infrastructure is variable for
local use. Happily, many renewable appetite systems can be scaled down for small
community-sized projects: