Richard (RJ) Eskow: Mr. President, Stop Protecting Bankers From These Law Enforcement Officials

Lately we’ve been conference some clever difference from a President about Wall Street crime. But when a cameras and lights aren’t around, his Administration’s been operative feverishly to strengthen bankers from state law coercion officials.

Six responsible Attorneys General trust a law relates to everyone. While they’re operative to pierce probity to Wall Street, White House officials are interference them by pulling a swain understanding with a banks that would finish their investigations and forestall them from prosecuting curved bankers.

If some-more people knew what was happening, a White House would be flooded with calls and emails perfectionist that it stop safeguarding Wall Street.

It’s still not too late for that.

The Evidence

The justification for Wall Street’s steal is overwhelming. The large banks have already sealed consent decrees and other papers in response to well-documented charges of perjury and filing of fake documents; bootleg foreclosures; rapist questionnaire through a steady use of law firms and foreclosure servicers famous to have disregarded a law; financier fraud; and other vital crimes.

Wall Street’s lawbreaking crashed a economy, left millions of people jobless, and cost a world’s economy trillions of dollars in mislaid wealth. People have been illegally evicted, and millions were cheated into borrowing income for genuine estate whose value had been artificially arrogant by bootleg means, and who now owe that income to a same bankers who committed a crimes.

But nothing of a criminals have left to jail – and they’re still collecting on those loans.

The Resistance

The shortcoming for prosecuting curved bankers belongs to both a Justice Department and a Attorneys General who offer as their states’ Chief Law Enforcement Officers. AGs for all fifty states were brought together to negotiate with a banks over Wall Street debt fraud, and fast came underneath heated vigour from a Administration and corporate interests. Under a care of self-indulgent Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, a organisation began to plead a White House-backed understanding that would strengthen rapist bankers from assign and let a banks settle for pennies on a dollar.

The initial AG to reject a understanding was New York’s Eric Schneiderman, whose office includes Wall Street. Schneiderman had been posterior rapist investigations and asked a organisation not to accept any agreement that would close them down before all a justification was in. He immediately came in for some complicated arm-twisting from Obama officials like HUD Secretary Shaun Donovan and tip people during a Justice Department – a same Justice Department that has refused to prosecute a singular landowner for rapist fraud, and can usually offer weak and improbable excuses for a disaster to do so.

Ohio’s Miller immediately private Schneiderman from a cabinet leading negotiations for a 50-member AG group, notwithstanding his state’s pivotal purpose in prosecuting bank fraud. That pierce was possibly designed to mislay Schneiderman from a room while negotiating with (and for) a banks, or it was Miller’s sparse approach of observant “you can’t lay with us in a propagandize cafeteria anymore.” Maybe it was both.

Schneiderman though soldiered on, apparently undeterred by possibly a Administration’s arm-twisting or Miller’s “you are so not unresolved with us, dude” tactics.

Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway soon stepped adult and corroborated Schneiderman, observant “There should be positively no rapist or polite shield given to banks for activity that has not nonetheless been investigated.” Delaware’s Beau Biden also assimilated with Schneiderman, and that’s important. Many New York-based companies, including my ex-employer AIG, are legally incorporated in Delaware to take advantage of that state’s auspicious corporate taxation policies. (Biden’s also facing a Administration that his father serves as Vice President, that contingency make for engaging cooking list conversations during holiday time.)

Massachusetts AG Martha Coakley has sued 5 banks for allegedly seizing private skill illegally. And a AGs of California and Nevada, Kamala Harris and Catherine Cortez Masto, have announced a corner review of a large bank debt activity in their states.

These AGs are fighting corporate change in sequence to defend a law. They’re on a right side of this fight. Look who’s not.

The Deal

For reasons famous usually to themselves, officials in a Obama Administration have spent some-more than a year perplexing to undercut these AGs. They’re pulling a understanding that would finish their investigations before they’re even finished and would immunize bankers from rapist prosecution.

Like a SEC’s scandalous swain deals, this Obama-backed allotment would let banks buy their approach out of assign with a slap-on-the-wrist allotment of $20-$25 billion. It would also emanate a artificial refinancing module to make it demeanour like banks are doing something about a tragedies they’ve combined by earnest to refinance “as many as” 300,000 underwater mortgages (meaning a genuine series could be most smaller than that).

It’s one some-more get-out-of-jail-free label for criminals on Wall Street.

The Damage

The amicable repairs from this understanding would be enormous. Consider:

It reinforces rapist behavior: Once again curved bankers would go unpunished. That would pledge they’ll dedicate these kinds of crimes again and again, meaningful they’ll never compensate for it with their time or their money. Thanks to other soothing deals like this one, large bank executives have already betrothed to stop their crimes (while “neither revelation nor denying wrongdoing”) — and afterwards steady them again and again, 51 times!

The victims will compensate for a crimes: Bankers defrauded their possess investors by concealing their possess loyal financial picture. The income paid in this allotment understanding will be paid, not by a lawbreaking bankers who got abounding off their possess crimes, though by a really same shareholders they defrauded.

It places a perps in assign of their possess restitution: The refinancing module (for “as many as” 300,000 homeowners) will be run by a banks themselves. The final Administration module designed to ‘help’ homeowners became a apparatus for banks to slice them off even some-more .Mortgage servicers misstated their total in that module as most as 80 percent of a time. Bankers used it to remove some-more income from homeowners, afterwards foreclosed on them anyway (often with fake papers or false figures) while a Administration looked a other way

The allotment volume is a little fragment of a mistreat caused: There are 11.1 million underwater mortgages. Homeowners still owe a banks $750 billion for housing value that has evaporated. The banks artificially pumped out genuine estate values, these homeowners borrowed opposite a arrogant prices, a housing marketplace crashed — and they’re left holding a bag while bankers are holding their bonuses. And they still owe a banks all that money.

It undermines a fabric of amicable trust: This understanding reinforces a summary that there’s one formula of probity for a abounding and absolute and another for everybody else. And that supervision works for a abounding and powerful, while a rest of us are on a own.

The Letter

We should be beholden for a bravery and integrity of these AGs. They need and merit a public’s approval and support. Voters need to tell a President that it’s wrong and unsuitable to pull for a bank-friendly understanding and criticise these open servants.

What’s your note to a White House going to say? Mine will go something like this:

Dear Mr. President:

That was one superb debate we gave in Kansas a other day. It was good when we betrothed to make certain that “penalties count” for bankers. And we were positively right when we pronounced that “Wall Street firms (keep) violating vital anti-fraud laws since a penalties are too diseased and there’s no cost for being a repeat offender.”

If we trust that, because is your Administration operative so tough to strengthen bankers from state law? we admire Eric Schneiderman, Beau Biden, Jack Conway, Martha Coakley, Kamala Harris, and Catherine Cortez Masto. Why is your staff pressuring them to stop questioning these crimes and let bankers off a hook?

If we meant what we said, Mr. President, greatfully tell your staff to behind off and let these good people do a jobs they were inaugurated to do.

Mr. President, we pronounced in Kansas that “a clever center category can usually exist in an economy where everybody plays by a same rules, from Wall Street to Main Street.” So because is your Administration perplexing to stop a states from enforcing those rules?

You were right when we pronounced that “there is a necessity of trust between Main Street and Wall Street.” Please revive and strengthen a trust between those streets – and with Pennsylvania Avenue – by directing your Administration to stop pulling this hurtful understanding and support Attorneys General Schneiderman, Biden, Conway, Coakley, Harris, and Masto.

Respectfully yours,

A Voter

(Related posts from

Pictures Of MERS, Part 1: Corporate Documents Illustrate The Mortgage Shell Game
Fix Foreclosure Fraud With A Borrowers’ Bill Of Rights
Getting Medieval On Your Assets: Four Reasons Foreclosure Fraud Really, Really Matters




Books by this author


This Blogger’s Books from



The Best Buddhist Writing 2008

The Best Buddhist Writing 2011 (A Shambhala Sun Book)



Follow Richard (RJ) Eskow on Twitter: