‘We simply can’t continue to survive with toxic drinking water,’ says Erin Brockovich, as a new report finds 200 million people exposed to chromium-6″
With Lake Okeechobee water levels too high and rising, polluted discharges to the St. Lucie River will increase to more than 1.1 billion gallons a day, the Army Corps of Engineers announced Thursday.
Looking for outdoor activities for the last two weeks of summer vacation?
Weekly Naturalist-led Tours of northern Broward County’s natural areas.
The free tours last about one hour each and are organized by the Parks and Recreation Department.
Participants should bring bottled water and wear closed-toe shoes and sunscreen.
The following locations offer tours at least once each month:
Florida regulators voted to approve new water quality standards Tuesday that will increase the amount of cancer-causing toxins allowed in Florida’s rivers and streams under a plan that the state says will protect more Floridians than the current standards do.
“The Environmental Regulation Commission voted 3-2 to approve a proposal drafted by state regulators that would impose new standards on 39 chemicals not currently regulated by the state, and revise the regulations on 43 other toxins, most of which are carcinogens.”
The Florida Department of Health announced Friday it had determined four Zika cases in the state were likely transmitted by local mosquitos, the first not linked to travel outside the U.S. mainland.
The controversial new rules for regulating toxic chemicals in Florida waters were approved by a state panel Tuesday.
— The White House (@WhiteHouse) June 18, 2016
By KEVIN WADLOW – KeysInfoNet
Frustration spills over seagrass die-off in Florida Bay, the worst in decades; residents and officials demand action
The campaign to save Florida Bay should move to the ballot box, speakers fumed Thursday in Islamorada.
“Talking to the politicians obviously is not working,” Islamorada Village Council member Jim Mooney said after a presentation on Florida Bay’s woes to the village board.
Read the complete arrticle:
Don’t skip out. Stay Informed. Get EcoWatch’s Top News of a Day.
Inflammation is a healthy routine that helps your physique reanimate and urge itself from harm. Unfortunately, it can infrequently run furious and turn chronic.
Chronic inflammation can final for a prolonged time—weeks, months or years—and might lead to several health problems. On a splendid side, there are many things we can do to revoke inflammation and urge your altogether health.
This essay outlines a minute devise for an anti-inflammatory diet and lifestyle.
What is Inflammation?
Inflammation is your body’s approach to strengthen itself from infection, illness or injury.
As partial of a inflammatory response, your physique increases prolongation of white blood cells, defence cells and substances called cytokines that assistance quarrel infection.
Classic signs of strident (short-term) inflammation embody redness, pain, feverishness and swelling.
On a other hand, ongoing (long-term) inflammation is mostly wordless and occurs inside a physique though any conspicuous symptoms.
Bottom Line: Inflammation is a protecting resource that allows your physique to urge itself opposite infection, illness or injury. It can also start on a ongoing basis, that can lead to several diseases.
An Unhealthy Lifestyle Can Drive Inflammation
Certain lifestyle factors can foster inflammation, generally when they start on a unchanging basis.
Vegetable oils used in many kinds of processed dishes are another culprit. Consuming them frequently formula in an imbalance of omega-6 to omega-3 greasy acids, that leads to inflammation (21, 22, 23).
Bottom Line: Eating diseased foods, celebration ethanol or sweetened beverages and removing small earthy activity all expostulate inflammation.
How to Reduce Inflammation With Your Diet
Antioxidants work by shortening levels of giveaway radicals. These reactive molecules are combined as a healthy partial of your metabolism, though can lead to inflammation when they’re not hold in check.
Vegetarian diets have also been shown to assistance revoke inflammation (35).
Bottom Line: Choose a offset diet that cuts out processed products and boosts your intake of whole, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant-rich foods.
Foods to Avoid
Some dishes are scandalous for compelling inflammation.
Consider minimizing or slicing these out completely:
- Refined carbs: White bread, white pasta, etc.
- Desserts: Cookies, candy, cake and ice cream
- Processed meat: Hot dogs, bologna, sausages, etc.
- Processed break foods: Crackers, chips and pretzels
- Trans fats: Foods with “partially hydrogenated” in a mixture list
- Alcohol: Excessive ethanol consumption
Bottom Line: Avoid or minimize sweetened dishes and beverages, extreme ethanol and dishes high in polished carbs and diseased fats.
Pages: 1 • 2
But with a Jul 1 deadline for complying with Vermont’s GMO labeling law on a horizon, a handful of a largest multinational food companies have announced they will now tag GMOs—not only since they will be forced to, though since as General Mills claims, they trust “you should know what’s in your food and how we make ours.”
Have consumers won a GMO labeling battle? Have these food companies that so fiercely fought to keep labels off their products unequivocally separate with a Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), a multi-billion-dollar lobbying organisation that is still perplexing to overturn Vermont’s law in a courts, and preempt it in Congress?
To be sure, consumer vigour has had an impact on brands’ decisions to label. We should applaud that. But before we mangle out a champagne, it’s value observant that not all of a food companies that announced skeleton to tag have taken a clever position on labeling. Equally important, four out of a five companies announced skeleton to tag after a Senate bill to preempt Vermont’s labeling law failed, though before a Senate has a possibility to come back with an nice chronicle of a check after Congress earnings on Apr 4 from Easter recess.
Is there something some-more to these new announcements than only a need to approve with Vermont’s law? As in, a plan to peace consumers into complacency, while during a same time forcing Congress to give food companies what they’ve wanted all along—a giveaway pass on labeling?
It’s also value observant that all of a companies that have suggested skeleton to tag adamantly urge a “safety” of GMOs—without once mentioning a fact that a immeasurable infancy of GMO crops, from that GMO food mixture are derived, are sprayed with glyphosate, classified final year by a World Health Organization as “a illusive tellurian carcinogen.” Clearly, we have a prolonged approach to go before food companies acknowledge a harmful consequences of a GMO monoculture indication on a environment, tellurian health and tellurian warming.
Who’s labeling, and why?
Campbell’s Soup Co. CPB (NYSE), General Mills (NYSE:GIS), Mars and Kellogg’s (NYSE: K) and ConAgra Foods(NYSE CAG) have all announced they will tag GMOs in time to approve with Vermont’s Jul 1 deadline, and in suitability with a Vermont law’s standards. The companies contend that any costs compared with labeling won’t be upheld on to consumers—a explain that deflates one of a industry’s long-standing, despite customarily debunked, arguments that GMO labeling will lead to aloft food prices for consumers.
Campbell’s was initial out of a gate, and a initial to mangle with a GMA on a lobbying group’s non-negotiable position opposite imperative labeling. After spending a half a million dollars to assistance better California’s Proposition 37 list beginning that would have mandated labels, Campbell’s now says a association supports a imperative sovereign labeling solution. Following Campbell’s Jan. 1 announcement, we reached out to explain what a soup association would do if Vermont’s law were preempted during a sovereign level. A Campbell’s orator responded by observant that regardless of what happens in Congress, Campbell’s products will be labeled, with a difference “partially constructed with genetic engineering,” in all 50 states. On a surface, that’s good news. But let’s not forget that a sovereign labeling check could dissuade companies from copy those, or identical difference on a label, in a seductiveness of preventing food producers from “stigmatizing” biotechnology.
Similarly, we reached out to General Mills, Mars and Kellogg’s this week seeking for construction on their positions. Kellogg’s responded, though wouldn’t yield answers to a approach questions, referring us instead to a central statement (which doesn’t answer a questions). We haven’t nonetheless listened behind from ConAgra, though we did accept responses from General Mills and Mars.
When asked if General Mills now supports a imperative sovereign labeling solution, Mike Siemienas, manager of code media relations, told us in an email that a cereal hulk is “supportive of a indication identical to what is used for organic products.” In other words, voluntary, not mandatory. Asked if General Mills would tag a GMO products according to Vermont standards even if Congress were to preempt Vermont, Siemienas wrote: “… we would approve with any law that Congress passes.” We took that as a no.
But General Mills appears (so far) to be alone in stability to side with a GMA on hostile imperative labeling laws. Jonathan Mudd, Mars’ tellurian executive of media relations, told us by email that Mars, like Campbell’s, supports “the investiture of a imperative inhabitant labeling system.” Mudd also reliable that Mars will tag a products “consistent with Vermont” regardless of either or not Vermont is preempted “because we trust in consumer transparency.” Mars pitched in $376,000 to better California’s Proposition 37. But after anti-labeling food companies became boycott targets following a better of Prop 37, Mars sat out identical battles in Washington State (2013) and Oregon (2014).
Campbell’s and Mars both cited a “need to equivocate a 50-state patchwork” of labeling laws as their reason for ancillary a imperative sovereign solution, as against to ancillary states’ rights to pass GMO labeling laws. On a surface, a patchwork evidence competence sound rational—until we consider a fact that there are some-more than 100 state laws, governing food labeling, including a Vermont maple syrup labeling law, and a Minnesota law ruling a labeling of furious rice. None of these laws ever combined “chaos” in a marketplace, as U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack has warned about Vermont’s GMO labeling law. And nothing were ever against with a same relentless determination, most reduction intemperate spending, as GMO labeling laws. Maybe since nothing of them influenced Monsanto’s bottom line?
Pages: 1 • 2